to wield the sword of copyright

chuck d.

Here is an article worth skimming. NAS (national academy of sciences) and NSTA (national science teachers association) plan to withold copyright permission for their science education standards manual to the Kansas Board of Education because they [kansas board of edu] flirt with the 'dreaded' idea that darwinism might be just as theoretical as intelligent design--and therefore worthy of discussion in the public classroom.
Apparently, certain folks (i wont categorize) get irrate when companies and groups limit their copyright as a weapon for their self-interest (as they should!). So here is the test: will these folks (no categories) get equally irrate, or strangly silent in this scenario?
This article is surprisingly even! Here is a pro-evolution lawyer that recognizes humbly that to remain silent in this case would be hypocritical.